Our Influences

Our Influences

At CISE our work is research-based-and-driven. The following resources are fundamental to the work we perform.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

National Standards:

Science

Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education (CSME) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4962

Committee on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards and National Research Council, Quinn, Helen & Schweingruber, Heidi & Keller, Thomas. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13165

Technology

International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA). (2007). Standards for Technological Literary: Content for the Study of Technology.© Third Edition. Reston, Virginia : International Technology Education Association (ITEA). Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf

International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2003). Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards. Reston, Virginia : International Technology Education Association (ITEA). Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/TAA/PDFs/AETL.pdf

Importance of Engineering for K-12 Education

Katehi, Linda. Pearson, Greg. & Feder, Michael. Editors: Committee on K-12 Engineering Education; National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12635

Mathematics

National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=16909

Common Core State Standards Initiative. The Standards>> Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/mathematics

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

How Students Learn

Committee on How People Learn: A Targeted Report for Teachers and National Research Council and Donovan, M. Suzanne and Bransford, John D. (2005). How students learn science in the classroom. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309089506

Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. and National Research Council of the National Academies. (2010). Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12614

Michaels, Sarah and Shouse, Andrew W. and Schweingruber, Heidi A. and National Research Council. (2007). Ready, Set, SCIENCE!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11882

National Research Council of the National Academies, Committee on Development of an Addendum to the National Science Education Standards on Scientific Inquiry. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, D.C. : The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9596

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Education Framework

Atherton, J.S. (2011) Learning and Teaching; Bloom’s Taxonomy. Retrieved from http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. , (1), 30-35.Technology and Engineering Teacher. Retrieved from http://opas.ous.edu/Work2009-2011/InClass/Bybee-Integrated%20STEM%20Plan.pdf

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson Powell, J., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. , Retrieved from BSCS Summaryhttp://www.bscs.org/pdf/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf

The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Complete Portfolio. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Problem-Based Learning

Capon, N, & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction. 22, 61-79.

Mergendoller, J.R., Maxwell, N., & Bellisimo, Y. (2007). The effectiveness of problem based instruction: A Comparative Study of Instructional Methods and Student Characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(2), 49-69. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol1/iss2/5/

Strobel, J. & van Barneveld, A. (2008) "When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms." Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 3(1), 44-58. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/4

Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: problem-based learning for k-16 education. (2 ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Walker, A. & Leary, H. (2008) A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences Across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 12-43. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/3

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Project-Based Learning

Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239-258.

Boss, S., & Krauss, J. (2007). Reinventing project-based learning. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.

Capon, N, & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 61-79.

Chu, S; Tse, S., Low, E; & Chow, K. (2011). Collaborative inquiry project-based learning: Effects on reading ability and interests. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 236-243

Drake, S. & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA.: ASCD.

Markham, T. (2003). Project Based Learning Handbook. Buck Inst for Education.

Walker, A. & Leary, H. (2008) A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences Across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 12-43. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/3

Strobel, J. & van Barneveld, A. (2008) When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 44-58. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol3/iss1/4

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Effective Use of Technology

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. (5), Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky - Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants - Part1.pdfOn the Horizon9

Prensky, M. (2007). Shaping tech for the classroom. Edutopia, Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/adopt-and-adapt

Lightle, K. (2011). More than just the technology. Science Scope, 34(9), 6-9. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/article.aspx?id=Z349URi8cV6lufHqA6yRknDQNwV2xvtW

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Modeling and Simulation

C. Wieman, W. Adams, P. Loeblein, and K. Perkins. Teaching Physics using PhET Simulations.The Press. http://phet.colorado.edu/publications/Teaching_physics_using_PhET_TPT.pdf

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Science and Literacy

Fang, Z., Lamme, L., & Pringle, R. (2010). Language and literacy in inquiry-based science classrooms, grades 3-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin

Marcarelli, K. (2010). Teaching science with interactive notebooks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, and evidence: the important place of argument in children's science writing. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

Science Notebooks in K12 Classrooms website: http://www.sciencenotebooks.org/resources/literature.php

Vasquex, J. (200). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Tools and traits for highly effective science teaching, k-8.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Working with Adult Learners

Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference? evaluating professional development: Redesigning Professional Development. (6), 45-51. 59

Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: a neglected species. (1st ed., p. 207). Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED084368.pdf

Laderas-Kilkenny, N. (2006, August 30). Generational learning styles and methods. Retrieved from http://nkilkenny.wordpress.com/2006/08/30/generational-learning-styles-and-methods/